Close Menu
WashingtonExec
    Podcast Episodes
    LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    WashingtonExec
    Subscribe To The Daily
    • News & Headlines
    • Executive Councils
    • Videos
    • Podcast
    • Events
      • 🏆 Chief Officer Awards
      • 🏆 Pinnacle Awards
    • About
    • Contact Us
    LinkedIn YouTube X (Twitter)
    WashingtonExec
    You are at:Home»Execs to Know»WINE & DINE COLUMN: How Do You Measure Wine Value?
    Execs to Know

    WINE & DINE COLUMN: How Do You Measure Wine Value?

    By Chris ParenteAugust 27, 2013
    Share
    LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
    Chris Parente
    Chris Parente

    How do you get good value from the wine you buy? It’s a natural question that many people have asked me. It’s also a very subjective question with no hard and fast answer. That said, the popularity of wine continues to increase, and so does the number of choices available to consumers.

    So despite the challenges involved, there will always be effort to empirically measure the value of wine. In wine circles the term for this debate is Quality to Price Ratio (QPR). At a basic level, you can obtain a QPR rating on a wine by simply dividing it’s average price by the average price of wine like it, by varietal and quality level.

    This requires a good bit of existing knowledge and isn’t very helpful for the typical consumer. And what about comparing wines that aren’t the same grape, region or ranking?

    Robert Dwyer of the Wellesley Wine Press is a wine blogger I respect and follow. He has expanded on the QPR equation, calling it the wwpQPR. He uses the 100 point scale from the Wine Spectator, and factors into the equation the fact that points above the number 90 are harder to obtain, and worth more, than points below.

    Without this addition, a wine with a ranking of 87 at $11 would always score better than a wine ranked 93 at $17. Most wine fans would agree they’d prefer the second bottle. So Dwyer builds in an assumption that for every three points above 90, quality doubles. For every three points below 90, quality is cut in half.

    You can also adjust the baseline assumption to suit your budget and taste. For demonstration purposes, Dwyer sets the baseline assumption at a 90 point ranked wine at $20 – right in line with my philosophy in general for wine buying. That baseline wine would equal a QPR of 1.0.

    Click here if you’d like to plug in some of your favorites into his QPR Tool.

    A lot of people would like to enjoy wine with dinner more frequently, but are turned off by high price markups. Here’s a value tip that may sound counter-intuitive – spend more on the bottle.

    Why is that a way to better value? It’s because restaurants have a lot more leeway in marking up inexpensive bottles of wine, as compared to more expensive. It’s easy to markup the $12 wholesale wine  three times on the wine list, but most restaurants have a hard time doing that with a wine that cost them $30. A $90 wine won’t sell high numbers in most places, so that wine will more probably be priced around $60 or $65, and be a better value.

    Those are two suggestions you can put to use to measure wine value. In the end of course, value comes from the same source as wine enjoyment – your individual palate. As you learn what you like, you’ll come to know how best to purchase it at a fair price. To liberally paraphrase the slogan of a now defunct local business, an educated consumer is the best wine buyer.

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Christopher Parente is managing director and partner of Strategic Communications Group, a social media and public relations consultancy based in Silver Spring, Maryland and Tysons Corner, Virginia. He also publishes Work, Wine and Wheels, a top 100K web site in the United States as measured by Alexa, an online measurement company. You can follow Chris on LinkedIn or Twitter.

     

    FCi Federal TILE AD

     

     

    Previous ArticleThe Verizon Foundation’s Justina Nixon-Saintil Talks Critical Need for STEM Education, the Verizon Innovating Learning Schools Program, and STEM’s Biggest Misconception
    Next Article Dan Wilbricht of Dell Software Talks Big Data’s Impact on Intelligence Community, the Next Big IT Innovation and Cyber Security for Mobile Apps

    Related Posts

    [COLUMN] Building the Future Today with Domestic Semiconductors

    Top Cyber Execs to Watch in 2025: GDIT’s Nabeela Barbari

    Top Cyber Execs to Watch in 2025: GrammaTech’s Ray DeMeo

    Comments are closed.

    LinkedIn Follow Button LinkedIn Logo Follow Us on LinkedIn
    2025 Chief Officer Awards - Finalists
    Latest Industry Leaders

    Top Chief Technology Officers to Watch in 2025

    Top General Counsels & Compliance Execs to Watch in 2025

    Load More
    Latest Posts

    [COLUMN] Building the Future Today with Domestic Semiconductors

    May 22, 2025

    Top Cyber Execs to Watch in 2025: GDIT’s Nabeela Barbari

    May 22, 2025

    Top Cyber Execs to Watch in 2025: GrammaTech’s Ray DeMeo

    May 22, 2025

    Amentum Names Helen Simms VP of International Technology & Innovation

    May 22, 2025

    From Flying Jets to Federal Innovation: How Marcus Lopez Drives Belcan’s Defense Growth Strategy

    May 21, 2025
    Quick Links
    • Executive Councils & Committees
    • Chief Officer Awards
    • Pinnacle Awards
    • Advertise With Us
    • About WashingtonExec
    • Contact
    Connect
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • Facebook
    • Twitter

    Subscribe to The Daily

    Connect. Inform. Celebrate.

    Copyright 2023 © WashingtonExec, Inc. | All Rights Reserved. Powered by J Media Group

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.